Distribution leveling for an agricultural combine

ABSTRACT

A method and system for controlling distribution of crop material to a cleaning sieve of an agricultural combine, for reducing grain loss, including while the combine is tilted sidewardly relative to horizontal, involving controlling the angular orientation of a distributor disposed between a threshing system of the combine and the sieve, for distributing a mat of the crop material onto the sieve evenly across an extent thereof. The angular orientation of the distributor can be set in advance of tilting of the combine, to adjust for a variety of conditions, including uneven outputting of the crop material from the threshing system, and the set orientation can be automatically maintained or actively adjusted to control a desired operating parameter such as grain loss, even as the combine is variously tilted and the angular orientation of the sieve relative to the combine is independently adjusted to maintain the sieve horizontal.

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No.60/901,228, filed Feb. 13, 2007.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates generally to distribution leveling for a combine,and more particularly, to a system and method for leveling or eveningthe distribution of threshed crops being delivered from the threshingsystem to the cleaning system of a combine, including when the receivingcomponent of the cleaning system is tilted to accommodate uneventerrain, such as when the combine is traveling along a hillside.

BACKGROUND ART

U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/901,228, filed Feb. 13, 2007, isincorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Combines are used all over the world to harvest a good many differentcrops. A typical combine configuration utilizes a separation orthreshing system including one or more rotors partially or fullysurrounded by a perforated concave, wherein threshed crop material willfall through the perforations of the concave enroute to a cleaningsystem operable for separating grain of the threshed crop material frommaterial other than grain (MDG). Often, the region of discharge of thisthreshed crop material from the separating system is not directly orcompletely above the cleaning system, and a pan or pans, conveyors, orthe like are used for conveying and directing the crop material to thecleaning system. It has been observed that not all types of crops willseparate in the same manner, and/or exit the threshing system evenly,and, as a result, the cleaning system may be loaded unevenly, even if anintermediate pan or conveyor system is used between the threshing andcleaning systems. For instance, when viewing a separating system fromthe front or rear, the threshed crop material may be observed to exitthe threshing system more heavily on one side or the other. In otherinstances, the crop material may exit more or less evenly. Thischaracteristic can also vary for an individual crop, and within a fieldand during a single crop harvesting session, for a variety of reasons,such as, but not limited to, variances in crop population, yield,moisture content and maturity level. A significant problem that canresult from uneven distribution of crop material to the cleaning systemis increased grain loss resulting from overloading of regions of thecleaning system sieve or sieves.

A variety of devices and systems have long been used for addressinguneven loading problems, but primarily in the context of those arisingfrom operation of a combine on a side slope. Reference in this regard,Hyman et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,557,276, issued Dec. 10, 1985 to SperryCorp. which discloses a four-way leveling mechanism for a combinecleaning apparatus. Reference also in this regard with respect to agrain pan disposed between the threshing system and the cleaning system,Hagerer et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,875,889, issued Oct. 24, 1989 to Deere &Co. which discloses use of adjustable vanes for compensating for unevenmaterial distribution over a grain pan for delivery of threshed cropmaterial to a cleaning system; and Grobler European Patent No. EP0212183B1 published Mar. 4, 1987, which discloses a combine harvester includinga preparation floor intermediate the threshing system and an upperscreen of a cleaning system, wherein the preparation floor and screenare independently pivotable laterally.

An observed shortcoming of the apparatus of U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,557,276 and4,875,889, is that when used alone, such that system is leveled relativeto a side slope on which the combine is located, crop materialdistribution on one or more regions of the sieve may still beconcentrated or heavier, as a function of the crop material flow fromthe threshing system, and significant grain loss can still occur. Theindependently tiltable, two section preparation floor of European PatentNo. EP0212183 B1, because of the split between the two sections, may notallow adequate distribution of crop material over the entire widththereof, particularly if crop deposition thereon from the threshingsystem is significantly greater on one of the sections, and if thepreparation floor is used for adjusting only for a side hill condition,it may not remedy heavier crop material deposition on one side thereofat all.

In light of the capabilities and limitations of the apparatus discussedabove for distributing crop material delivery to a cleaning system of acombine, what is sought is a system and method which allows optimizingthis capability for accommodating both uneven threshing system output,and uneven terrain, particularly side slope conditions.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

What is disclosed is a system and method for distributing crop materialto a cleaning system of a combine, which allows optimizing thecapability for accommodating both uneven threshing system output, anduneven terrain, particularly side slope conditions.

According to a preferred aspect of the invention, the method and systemis operable for controlling distribution of crop material to a cleaningsieve of the cleaning system, for reducing grain loss, including whilethe combine is tilted sidewardly relative to horizontal. The angularorientation of the sieve can also be controlled to compensate for thetilt as a separate function under control of a separate leveling system,or under control of the system of the invention. The system of theinvention functions by controlling the angular orientation of adistributor disposed between the threshing system and the sieve, fordistributing the crop material onto the sieve evenly across an extentthereof. The angular orientation of the distributor can be set inadvance of tilting of the combine, to adjust for a variety ofconditions, including uneven outputting of the crop material from thethreshing system, and the set orientation can be automaticallymaintained as the combine is variously tilted, and the cleaning systemsieve is leveled if a leveling system is present, or is tilted with thecombine.

According to another preferred aspect of the invention, the angularorientation of the distributor is controlled by a control system, whichcan be, but is not limited to, a suitable programmable controllercurrently used for controlling combine operations. The system can alsoinclude an input device to enable an operator to input positionalcommands for the distributor, to enable the operator to determine andset the distributor angular position. Here, it should be understood thata threshing system will often discharge crop material at higher rates,or heavier, from some regions thereof compared to others. This can occurfor a variety of reasons, such as, but not limited to, crop type,population, and moisture content, and can vary at least somewhat overthe course of a harvesting episode. This can also occur, at least inpart, as a result of combine settings, such as, but not limited to, aspeed of operation of a rotor of the threshing system, and a gap betweena rotor and concave of the threshing system.

According to another preferred aspect of the invention, the distributorsetting can be a function of an indicator of performance, such as thatof the cleaning system, which can include, but is not limited to, grainloss, and which can be determined and monitored on an ongoing basis, inreal-time, or near real-time, using monitors or sensors, such as, butnot limited to, conventional, commercially available grain loss sensors.Grain loss sensors are typically located adjacent an edge of thecleaning sieve past which elements of material other than grain arepropelled for removal from the cleaning system. Generally, in operation,grain in the crop material will fall through the sieve, while a flow ofair directed upwardly through the sieve and toward the edge operates incooperation with vibration of the sieve, for urging the lighter elementsof the crop material other than grain (MDG) toward and over or past theedge. Some grain will typically be mixed with the MDG, so as to be lost.As discussed above, it has been found that the amount of grain mixedwith the MDG can vary as a function of crop material distribution overthe surface of the sieve, which, in turn, can be a function of factorsincluding, but not limited to, the evenness of the delivery of a mat ofthe crop material onto the sieve (which can be a function of factorsdiscussed above, e.g., crop type, population, and moisture content, andthreshing system settings, e.g., rotor speed and concave gap), and theangular orientation of the sieve, such as a tilting thereof resultingfrom operation of the combine on a hillside.

Grain loss sensors are operable in the conventional, well-known manner,for instance, by sensing electrical capacitance change, for measuring orquantifying the amount of grain loss past the edge of the cleaningsieve, and can be disposed, for instance, adjacent opposite ends of theedge of the sieve, and at one or more intermediate locations therealong,for determining grain losses at those locations, which information canbe used for determining a distribution of grain losses across the edgeor extent of the sieve. Grain loss sensors can be used alone, or withone or more other sensors, for instance, a load sensor, mass sensor,optical sensor, or the like, for determining crop material distributionon or to the cleaning sieve, and/or on or a crop material distributordisposed intermediate the threshing and cleaning systems, such as, agrain pan, sieve, preparation floor, or the like.

According to still another preferred aspect of the invention, thecontrol system can control the angular orientation of the distributorfor distributing crop material to the cleaning sieve in a desired orrequired manner for minimizing grain loss, during sideward tilting ofthe combine, and while the cleaning sieve is controlled at differentangular orientations for accommodating the tilt, and/or for furtherdistributing the crop material thereover.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a side view of an agricultural combine, including a system fordistributing crop material to a cleaning system of the combine,according to the present invention;

FIG. 2 is an enlarged fragmentary end view of a representative cropmaterial distributor or cleaning sieve of the combine of FIG. 1, showingan actuator in combination therewith and controllably operable forpositioning the distributor or sieve in a selected angular orientationwithin a range of angular orientations;

FIG. 3 is a fragmentary perspective representation of the crop materialdistributor or cleaning sieve and actuator of FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 is a diagrammatic representation of one embodiment of the systemof the invention;

FIG. 5 is a simplified schematic rear view of the combine of FIG. 1,shown tilted sidewardly, and illustrating angularly oriented positionsof a crop material distributor and cleaning sieve of the combine,respectively;

FIG. 6 is another rear view of the combine tilted sidewardly and showingthe crop material distributor and cleaning sieve angularly oriented, andillustrating representative flows of crop material discharge from athreshing system onto the distributor, and resulting crop material flowfrom the distributor to an upper cleaning sieve, and grain flow throughthe cleaning system;

FIG. 7 is a simplified schematic rear view of the combine, tiltedsidewardly, and illustrating representative crop material discharge fromthe threshing system onto the distributor, and crop material flow fromthe distributor to an upper cleaning sieve;

FIG. 8 is another simplified schematic rear view of the combine, tiltedsidewardly in a different direction, and illustrating representativecrop material discharge;

FIG. 9 is a high-level flow diagram illustrating steps of a method ofthe invention;

FIG. 10 is a diagrammatic representation of another embodiment of thesystem of the invention; and

FIG. 11 is another simplified schematic rear view of the combine, tiltedsidewardly, illustrating representative crop material discharge from thethreshing system onto the distributor, and with the distributor and thesieves positioned at different angular orientations for distributing thecrop material.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Referring now to the drawings, wherein preferred embodiments of thepresent invention are shown, in FIG. 1, a typical self-propelledagricultural combine 10 is shown, including a header 12 mounted on afront end thereof, and operable for severing crops from a field duringforward motion of combine 10. Combine 10 includes a feeder 14 operablefor conveying the cut crops to a rotary threshing system 16 withincombine 10. Threshing system 16 generally includes one or more rotors 18rotatable within a corresponding number of perforated concaves 20, forthreshing and separating smaller elements of crop material includinggrain from larger elements such as stalks, leaves and the like. Flows ofthe smaller elements of the crop material are discharged through theperforations of concave 20, as denoted generally by arrows A. Generally,the flows of crop material denoted by arrows A will be uneven, so as tobe more concentrated or heavier in some regions, and lighter in otherregions, which unevenness will be the result of one or more of a varietyof factors, as discussed above.

The flows of crop material, denoted by arrows A, will fall mostly onto acrop material distributor 22 disposed beneath threshing system 16, whichdistributor 22 can comprise a conventionally constructed grain panoperable for conveying crop material rearwardly thereover to a rear edgethereof, over which the crop material will be propelled so as to fall asa mat onto an upper cleaning sieve 24 of a cleaning system 26 of combine10. Alternatively, distributor 22 can comprise a sieve. As the cropmaterial mat drops onto upper cleaning sieve 24, that sieve will bevibrated while a flow of air is directed upwardly and rearwardlytherethrough, as denoted by arrows B, such that larger, lighter elementsof the crop material other than grain will be directed over or past arear edge 28 of sieve 24, for disposal, in the well-known manner.Smaller, heavier elements of the crop material, including grain, will beallowed to pass downwardly through sieve 24 to a lower sieve 30, forfurther cleaning, again, in the well known manner.

Referring also to FIGS. 2, 3 and 4, crop material distributor 22, andalso at least upper cleaning sieve 24, are configured so as to bepositionable within a predetermined range of angular positions whenviewed from the front or rear, as controlled by an actuator 34 and anactuator 36, respectively. To provide this capability, distributor 22and at least sieve 24 are supported within combine 10 for sidewardpivotal movement, here, about a forward and rearward extending pivotalaxis 38 and a similarly extending pivotal axis 40, disposed beneathdistributor 22 and sieve 24, respectively. Actuator 34 preferablycomprises a suitable device connected between a structural element 42,and an arm 44 projecting from distributor 22, and is operable forcontrollably sidewardly pivoting the distributor about axis 38, asgenerally denoted by arrow C in FIGS. 2 and 3. Actuator 36 can besimilarly constructed and operable, or can be of different construction.Here, actuators 34 and 36 are both illustrated as being linear actuatorswhich can be suitably powered, for instance, electrically or fluidly, inthe well-known manner. Alternatively, the actuators could compriserotary actuators, motors, or the like. As another alternative, one orboth of distributor 22 and sieve 24 can be supported in a differentmanner, such as pivotally from one side. As still another alternative,actuator 34 and distributor 22 can be supported on cleaning system 26,and both sieves 24 and 30 of cleaning system 26 can pivot together, suchthat distributor 22 will be pivoted by pivotal movement of the sieves,as illustrated by the embodiment in FIG. 5. And, as a furtheralternative, sieve 24 and the entire cleaning system can be of anon-leveling variety, in which case, and actuator 36 and the pivotingsupport structure for sieve 24 would not be present.

In the embodiment of combine 10 shown, actuators 34 and 36 are bothoperatively connected to a single controller 46, which preferablycomprises a conventional programmable processor based controllercommonly utilized for controlling various combine operations andfunctions in the well-known manner. In this regard, controller 46 cancontrol actuator 34 for controlling the position of distributor 22 forcontrolling grain distribution to sieve 24 as a function of a desiredparameter according to the present invention, which here has beenselected to be grain loss, while separately controlling actuator 36 forcontrolling the position of sieve 24 responsive to tilting of combine10, as a function of a leveling system feature. Thus, system 32comprises controller 46, but it should be recognized that controller 46can perform a variety of other functions, including, but not limited to,cleaning system leveling. System 32 additionally is illustrated ascomprising an optional input device 50, which can be for instance, aninteractive device such as a touch screen or the like, or a switch,connected to controller 46 and located within an operator cab 52 ofcombine 10, usable for inputting positional and other commands to system32, and optionally for viewing system information. System 32 preferablyalso comprises at least one sensor operable for sensing or detecting acondition indicative of performance thereof, and/or the effects ofperformance thereof, to facilitate monitoring and controlling operationthereof, which, in this embodiment of the system, preferably includes atleast two grain loss detectors 54 and 56 disposed adjacent opposite endsof, or at spaced apart locations along, rear edge 28 of sieve 24.Additionally, if combine 10 includes a leveling system for cleaningsystem 26, this will typically include a tilt sensor operable forinputting information to controller 46, or another controller of theleveling system, for use in controlling the leveling of the cleaningsystem. This information, if present, can also be used by the system ofthe invention.

Controller 46 is connected to actuator 34; to actuator 36, if present(if a cleaning system leveling capability is provided); to input device50; and to grain loss detectors 54 and 56, via suitable conductive paths58, which can include, for instance, but are not limited to, wires of awiring harness, and/or one or more communications networks, such as acontroller area network.

Controller 46 is automatically operable for controlling the angularposition of distributor 22 as a function of system 32, and at leastsieve 24 of cleaning system 26 (sieves 24 and 30 being jointly orseparately controllable, as desired for a particular application) as afunction of the leveling system. Here, as explained above, under atleast some circumstances, threshing system 16 will discharge cropmaterial at higher rates, or in heavier concentrations, from someregions of concave 20 compared to others. This can occur for a varietyof reasons, such as, but not limited to, crop type, population, andmoisture content, and can vary at least somewhat over the course of aharvesting episode. This can also occur, at least in part, as a resultof combine settings, such as, but not limited to, a speed of operationof rotor 18, and a gap between rotor 18 and concave 20. This isundesirable, as also explained above, as it can affect the performanceof cleaning system 26, particularly the amount of grain loss, as heavybuild ups of crop material, particularly on upper sieve 24, can resultin increased grain loss over or past rear edge 28. A problem identifiedabove in this regard is that crop material build ups and concentrationson distributor 22 will typically be conveyed onto upper sieve 24.Sideward tilting of the combine can also result in increased cropmaterial concentrations and build ups, particularly toward the downhillside of the combine. Such build ups can be particularly problematic whenthe threshing system of a combine is more heavily discharging cropmaterial toward the downhill side of the distributor.

Referring also to FIGS. 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9, system 32 is automaticallyoperable for addressing and substantially reducing or eliminating cropmaterial build ups on upper sieve 24 resulting from uneven flow of thecrop mat from threshing system 16, by controlling the angularorientation of distributor 22 so as to even the feeding of the cropmaterial mat onto upper sieve 24. As examples, in FIGS. 5, 6 and 7,combine 10 is illustrated tilted downwardly toward the left-hand side;in FIG. 8, combine 10 is illustrated tilted upwardly toward theleft-hand side, and, in both instances, distributor 22 is illustrated asbeing angularly oriented as required for evening the crop flow therefromto upper sieve 24.

More particularly, in FIGS. 6 and 7, crop material flow A from concave20 of threshing system 16 is illustrated as being heavier toward theleft-hand side. As a result, the crop material deposition on theleft-hand side of distributor 22 is heavier compared to the right-handside. Responsively, actuator 34 is operated to position distributor 22in an angular orientation extending downwardly by a required amounttoward the right-hand side, such that the crop material mat falls evenlyfrom distributor 22 onto upper sieve 24. Here, it should be observedthat at least upper sieve 24 of cleaning system 26 is also tilteddownwardly toward the right hand side relative to combine 10, as afunction of the leveling system operation, so as to be level, orhorizontal in the sideward direction, to thereby correct for thesideward tilt of combine 10. This serves to maintain performance of thecleaning system at a high level.

Referring more particularly to FIG. 8, combine 10 is illustrated tiltedin the opposite direction, that is, upwardly toward the left-hand side,and crop material flow A from concave 20 of threshing system 16 isillustrated as being heavier toward the right-hand side. So as not todeposit the crop material mat onto sieve 22 in this unevenconcentration, distributor 22 is automatically controlled so as to beangularly oriented by system 32, so as to extend downwardly by arequired amount toward the left-hand side, to correct this distributionproblem. As a result, as the material mat is conveyed over distributor22 toward the rear end thereof, it will be spread toward the left-handside so as to be more even. As in the previous example, the cropmaterial mat will then drop in this more evenly distributed manner, ontoupper sieve 24. Here, it should be noted that at least upper sieve 24 ofcleaning system 26 is also tilted upwardly toward the right-hand side ofcombine 10, as a function of the leveling system operation, so as to belevel, that is, horizontal in the sideward direction, to thereby correctfor the sideward tilt of combine 10, to maintain performance of thecleaning system.

As a further detail, one can see that the sieve or sieves of cleaningsystem 26 could be tilted to one side, for instance, the left-hand sideof combine 10, and distributor 22 tilted to the opposite side, forinstance the right-hand side. The cleaning sieve would be tiltedrelative to the combine, but level to horizontal, to maintain minimalgrain loss resulting from the slope of the ground, whereas distributor22 would be tilted relative to the combine and horizontal to getmaterial distributed to the cleaning system in an even mat or flow. Thedifference between the angular orientations of the distributor andcleaning sieve or sieves would be controlled as a function of the amountof grain loss sensed by the grain loss detectors. One should also notethat it would be possible for the distributor and the cleaning sieve orsieves to be positioned at the same angular orientation, as would be thecase if the threshing system delivered the crop material evenly to thedistributor.

Further, controller 46 of system 32 is automatically operable fordetermining an angular orientation of distributor 22 required forevening out crop material flow to cleaning system 26, in an ongoingmanner, in real-time, or near real-time, responsive to a sensedcondition or conditions indicative of performance and/or anotherselected parameter, which here is grain loss, as sensed by grain lossdetectors 54 and 56. The angular orientation of distributor 22 can alsobe set by an operator, via commands inputted using input device 50.System 32 can then automatically operate to maintain a performanceparameter achieved by the inputted setting, for instance, a satisfactoryor set grain loss level, and can operate to even out the grain lossbetween the two sides of the cleaning system, as a function ofcomparison of the signals from grain loss sensors 54 and 56. Thus, ifgrain distribution from the threshing system changes, for instance, as afunction of any of the factors discussed above, and grain loss from oneside of the cleaning system exceeds loss from the other side by acertain amount, system 32 can automatically detect this. Controller 46can then responsively make an appropriate adjustments in the angularposition of distributor 22 via actuator 34, as required.

FIG. 9 is a high level flow diagram 58 illustrating steps of onepossible method of operation of system 32 for controlling theorientation of distributor 22, in cooperation with a leveling system forcontrolling orientation of at least sieve 24 of cleaning system 26responsive to tilting of combine 10. According to the method, at block60, a distributor angle will be determined. This can be via an automaticprocess as controlled by controller 46, responsive to a desiredparameter, such as grain loss, and the above-described manner.Alternatively, this could be responsive to a manually inputted command,via input device 50. Controller 46 will then either automaticallycontrol distributor 22 for controlling the control parameter, e.g.,grain loss, or for maintaining the inputted position. As part of itscleaning system leveling function, controller 46 will also monitorsideward tilting of combine 10. If a side hill is detected, e.g., tilt,as denoted at decision block 62, controller 46 will adjust the angularorientation of cleaning sieve 24 (and other elements of the cleaningsystem if so equipped) so as to be level or horizontal, as denoted atblock 64. Additionally, controller 46 can also operate to adjust theangular orientation of distributor 22 for the tilting condition, suchthat the control parameter, e.g., grain loss, or inputted command, ismaintained, as denoted at block 66. In this latter regard, it should berecognized that when combine 10 is tilted, the locations of cropmaterial deposition on distributor 22 can vary or change as a functionof the degree of tilt. To accommodate this, controller 46 can beprogrammed to automatically adjust for such tilting, on an ongoingbasis, in real-time, or near real-time, to maintain the controlparameter, or the commanded angular orientation of distributor 22 inrelation to a fixed reference, such as horizontal, so as to maintainsystem performance.

With the examples provided above, one can understand that about anycombination of angles could be present between a distributor of acombine, and sieves of a cleaning system thereof. It should also beunderstood that the system of the invention is not limited to use with aself leveling cleaning system. In the event that a machine does not havea self leveling cleaning system, side hill performance can be furtherenhanced by tilting the distributor to deliver material to the uphillside. This would then allow for additional performance of a fixedcleaning system combine on side hills.

Referring also FIGS. 10 and 11, it is contemplated according to theinvention, that system 32 can be configured so as to additionallycontrol the angular orientation of at least upper sieve 24 of cleaningsystem 26, for also adjusting or evening distribution of crop materialthereon. In this regard, it is contemplated that under some conditions,the possible variations in angular orientation of distributor 22 thatcan be effected by operation of system 32 may be inadequate tosatisfactorily evenly distribute the crop material flow onto sieve 24,and, as a result, it would be advantageous to also control the angularorientation of that sieve for increasing or improving evenness of thedistribution. This will be accomplished by control of actuator 36 viacontroller 46, and can be performed instead of or in association withleveling of one or both of the sieves of cleaning system 26.Additionally, according to this aspect of the invention, it iscontemplated that controller 46 can automatically control actuators 34and 36 for achieving a combination of angular orientations ofdistributor 22 and at least sieve 24, that will achieve a desiredevenness of crop material distribution. Here, system 32 will beconfigured as described above, and, in addition to the elements alreadydescribed, can include one or more additional grain loss detectors 55disposed between detectors 54 and 56, so as to provide more detailedinformation regarding grain loss and thus crop material distribution onsieve 24. The one or more detectors 55 will be suitably connected tocontroller 46 via a suitable conductive path 58, as discussed above. Inoperation, an elevated grain loss detected by one or two of detectors54, 55 and 56, would indicate uneven crop material distribution, andcontroller 46 would responsively determine a corrective angular positionof one or both distributor 22, and sieves 24 and 30. In this regard, astepped approach to adjusting the angular position of one or both couldbe employed, to incrementally approach an even crop material on sieve24. Again, this can be performed on an ongoing, real-time, or nearreal-time basis.

Examining FIG. 11 in particular, crop material flow A from concave 20 ofthreshing system 16 is illustrated as being heavier toward theright-hand side, such that distributor 22 of system 32 is responsivelytilted downwardly toward the left-hand side. If warranted, sieve 24 ofcleaning system 26, and also sieve 30, can be also be tilted asrequired, here also downwardly toward the left-hand side, for achievingdesired evenness of distribution of crop material on sieve 24, even whencombine 10 is tilted. Thus, is demonstrated that system 32 is operablefor overriding the leveling function for cleaning system 26, so as toachieve desired crop distribution thereon, and thus maximum performance.

It will be understood that changes in the details, materials, steps, andarrangements of parts which have been described and illustrated toexplain the nature of the invention will occur to and may be made bythose skilled in the art upon a reading of this disclosure within theprinciples and scope of the invention. The foregoing descriptionillustrates the preferred embodiment of the invention; however,concepts, as based upon the description, may be employed in otherembodiments without departing from the scope of the invention.Accordingly, the following claims are intended to protect the inventionbroadly as well as in the specific form shown.

1-5. (canceled)
 6. A method for controlling loss of grain from acleaning sieve of an agricultural combine while sidewardly tiltedrelative to horizontal, comprising steps of: controlling an angularorientation of a crop material distributor disposed between a threshingsystem of the combine and the sieve, for distributing crop material fromthe threshing system at least generally evenly onto the sieve; whilecontrolling an angular orientation of the sieve so as to be at leastsubstantially horizontal when viewed from a front or rear direction. 7.The method of claim 6, wherein the crop distributor is set at an initialangular orientation for minimizing the loss of the grain from thecleaning sieve, and then the angular orientation of the distributor isen adjusted to compensate for the sideward tilt of the combine.
 8. Themethod of claim 6, wherein the distributor comprises a sieve.
 9. Themethod of claim 6, wherein the distributor comprises a pan.
 10. A methodfor distributing crop material from a threshing system of anagricultural combine onto a cleaning sieve thereof, comprising steps of:setting an angular orientation of a crop material distributor disposedbeneath the threshing system, so as to distribute a flow of cropmaterial deposited on the distributor substantially evenly across anextent of the cleaning sieve; and automatically controlling an angularorientation of the cleaning sieve relative to the combine, to maintainthe sieve generally horizontal, responsive to tilting of the combine toan acute angle relative to horizontal, while automatically adjusting theangular orientation of the distributor responsive to the tilting, formaintaining the even distribution of the crop material.
 11. The methodof claim 10, wherein the steps of setting and adjusting the angularorientation of the distributor are performed responsive to a measure ofgrain loss from the sieve.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein themeasure of grain loss from the sieve is determined as a function ofoutputs from at least one grain loss sensor.
 13. The method of claim 10,wherein the distributor comprises a grain pan.
 14. The method of claim10, wherein the distributor comprises a sieve.
 15. The method of claim10, further comprising a step of providing a control system in operativecontrol of actuators connected to the distributor and to the sieve,respectively, and operatively controllable for varying the angularorientations thereof, respectively.